The richer the rich, the more taxed? Domestic experts have suggested that the three types of rich taxes should be issued? Do you recognize

After last year's epidemic, I believe everyone heard such news: "The wealthy assets increased greatly after the epidemic." The most obvious is the United States. It is reported that after the epidemic, the richest 10%of the net assets of Americans have increased by more than $ 8 trillion. In addition, statistics from relevant US departments, nearly 40%of the overall consumption expenditure in the United States comes from 1/5 groups with the highest income, and 20%of the low -level families account for about 9%of all expenditures.
In fact, the uneven distribution of global wealth is the default thing, and all countries have a certain problem of rich and poor. Last year, another data shows that the 26 top wealthy people in the world have more than half of the world's wealth, and their wealth is about the total wealth of the world's most poor 4 billion people.
. After the epidemic in the United States, many residents were affected, while the wealth of the top rich in the United States increased against the trend, which was in vain with the general residents of the United States to receive unemployment subsidies at that time to receive unemployment subsidies. Compared. At that time, this phenomenon caused the dissatisfaction of many local experts.
, the fact that "the rich the rich" is known to us. In this context, such a tax has been raised again and again. This is the "rich tax".
has always said that the United States has a wealthy tax. Earlier this year, the United States also plans to "double" the capital gain tax rate of more than $ 1 million in people with an annual income of more than $ 1 million, from about 20%to 40 to 40 to 40 %, And the purpose of taxation is to help grow up growing fiscal expenditures to reduce the level of rich and poor in the United States.
, no one is willing to increase taxes, although the purpose of tax increases is to curb the expansion of the gap between the rich and the poor. But to be honest, it is not easy to bridge the fiscal gap and suppress the gap between the rich and the poor through the tax increase plan.
In addition to the United States, other countries also have relevant policies for "rich people taxes", and of course they have been canceled within a few years. No, recently, my country has also reported news about the taxation of rich people.
Economist Jia Kang said in the relevant interview that "whether it can be reduced by levying the" rich tax tax "to narrow the gap between the rich and the poor." Fat" . However, Jia Kang also said that "fat" is not simply robbing the rich and helping the poor, but can make more contributions when acceptable ... "Pumping fat and thinning" or supporting vulnerable groups. This is One function must be further improved.
In addition to solving the gap between the rich and the poor by levying the rich tax, Jia Kang also believes that my country can also consider the launch of inheritance tax and gift tax. Because once these taxes are established, the rich knows that his property cannot be left to his family as expected. Instead of paying so many taxes, it is better to donate part of the assets and set up a public welfare foundation. of.
Under these taxes, the rich had to face a choice. Whether to choose to pay more taxes to let all your assets leave the offspring, or choose to get a part of donation.
In in the end, Jia Kang felt that the rich should contribute a little more to society, and whether it is a rich tax, inheritance tax, or gift tax, it is one of the ways to donate money for the rich.
, the rich tax tax does not mean that it is levied, which involves too many places to consider and considers. After levying these taxes, how to "make up" to the society or a disadvantaged group is also a one. Question! In this regard, what do you think of Jia Kang's suggestions?